In this article

  1. 01Start with the criterion being assessed
  2. 02Record the example before the interpretation
  3. 03Distinguish missing evidence from evidence of a concern
  4. 04Keep personal and irrelevant information out of the assessment
  5. 05Document before the group discussion changes the account
  6. 06Store a concise decision record through the approved process

Start with the criterion being assessed

Give interviewers the role’s agreed requirements and the topics they are responsible for exploring. Each note should identify the relevant criterion. If the conversation moves to another subject, record that separately so an interesting answer is not mistaken for evidence of a requirement it never addressed.

OPM’s structured-interview guidance connects questions and evaluation with job-related competencies. Adapt that principle to your notes. A review of a candidate’s example is more useful when the next reader can see which responsibility the example was intended to demonstrate.

Record the example before the interpretation

Capture the important facts of the candidate’s account: the situation, their responsibility, their actions, and the result they reported. Keep notes proportionate to the decision. You do not need a transcript, and you should not retain patient information or confidential material offered during a hiring discussion.

An illustrative observation is: 'Described coordinating an orientation schedule; explained their scheduling actions but did not establish authority for competency approval.' The separate interpretation might be that coordination experience is supported while approval responsibility remains unverified. That is more precise than calling the person an experienced educator.

Distinguish missing evidence from evidence of a concern

If a topic was not explored, record that it was not assessed. If the candidate answered but did not provide the needed detail, identify what remains unclear. If the response demonstrates a relevant limitation, explain the limitation against the criterion. These are different findings with different next steps.

Do not lower a rating solely because an interviewer ran out of time or forgot the assigned question. The panel lead should decide whether clarification is needed and apply an appropriate, consistent process. Clear notes make that decision possible without forcing another full interview.

  • Observed: what example or behavior was actually provided?
  • Interpretation: what does it support about this criterion?
  • Gap: what remains unassessed or unverified?
  • Next step: what specific clarification could affect the decision?

Keep personal and irrelevant information out of the assessment

Use job-related language and avoid speculation about health, age, family plans, identity, or circumstances unrelated to the role. If information requiring a separate HR process arises, let the appropriate owner handle it rather than incorporating it into informal selection notes.

The EEOC’s hiring guidance addresses consistent screening and questions that employers cannot or should not ask. Have HR set the documentation process and applicable record requirements. This article provides a note-taking method rather than a universal retention schedule or a substitute for the organization’s obligations.

Document before the group discussion changes the account

Ask interviewers to submit their initial observations before the recommendation meeting. Review the evidence against the agreed criteria, then record any clarification that changes an interpretation. Preserve the distinction between what the candidate said and what the team concluded.

When reviewers disagree, ask them to identify the relevant observation and standard. Do not edit the original record to make it appear that everyone initially agreed. A final decision can be well supported even when the panel reached it through a documented discussion.

Store a concise decision record through the approved process

Use the organization’s authorized hiring system and limit access to the appropriate people. Follow its rules for records, security, and retention. Avoid maintaining separate personal copies in messaging threads or local files that other decision makers cannot reconcile.

End with a short recommendation tied to the evidence and a list of remaining steps. Required credential verification and employment approval should retain their own status. Useful notes support a hiring judgment; they do not establish that every other requirement for a permanent start has been completed.

Sources and further reading

Sources checked October 12, 2026