In this article
1. Define the role before researching pay
Write down the occupation, clinical duties, leadership responsibilities, location, employment structure, hours, and coverage expectations. Include required qualifications and the experience genuinely needed to perform the work. A benchmark for a staff clinician may not fit a position that also supervises a team or manages a program.
Keep a record of assumptions. Specify whether the comparison concerns annual base salary, hourly wages, or another measure. Full-time and part-time figures need a consistent basis, and workload differences should remain visible. Do not annualize a number mechanically if doing so hides a materially different schedule or employment arrangement.
- Clinical and leadership duties
- Geographic market and work location
- Scheduled hours, call, and additional coverage
- Guaranteed pay versus conditional compensation
2. Use official occupational data carefully
BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics provides wage estimates by occupation and geographic area, with additional industry information. Start by reading the occupation definition, then select the closest defensible comparison. A broad nurse practitioner category should not be described as a precise PMHNP-only salary survey.
Record the data period, occupation, geography, and wage measure you used. Read the coverage and methodological notes before combining figures. If a local estimate is unavailable, disclose the broader comparison instead of presenting it as exact local evidence. Wage estimates are a research input, not an offer recommendation for a specific candidate.
- Save the source and retrieval date
- Identify median, mean, or percentile correctly
- Note any specialty or geographic mismatch
3. Add clearly labeled local hiring evidence
Review comparable publicly advertised roles, recent accepted offers within your organization, and qualified candidate feedback from current searches. Compare duties as well as titles. A higher advertised maximum may depend on experience, call, incentives, or responsibilities your position does not include.
Keep public postings separate from accepted-offer data and anecdotal feedback. Record sample size and limitations. One declined offer is useful information, but it does not establish the entire market. Work through approved HR processes and avoid collecting or sharing unnecessary personal compensation information. Any legal requirements affecting pay disclosure or hiring practices need qualified review.
4. Describe the whole package without mixing categories
List base compensation separately from sign-on payments, relocation support, variable incentives, benefits, paid leave, professional-development support, and call pay. Identify which items are guaranteed, conditional, discretionary, or subject to repayment terms. Do not make an uncertain bonus look like dependable annual income.
Candidates also evaluate schedule and support. Those features belong in the recruiting brief, but they should not be converted into invented dollar values. If an incentive formula is proposed, have the responsible owners verify how it works and provide an understandable written explanation. Clinical work expectations should remain visible alongside the compensation discussion.
5. Check internal consistency and approval boundaries
Ask HR and leadership to review how the proposed range relates to comparable internal roles and the approved budget. Define who can authorize changes and what evidence would support an exception. Recruiters need a clear boundary so that candidate conversations do not produce commitments the organization cannot honor.
Resolve the offer process before launching the search. Who confirms the final package, signs the documents, and explains benefits? Which terms require further review? This step is especially important when a clinical leader, HR partner, and executive each control different parts of the offer. An approved range alone is not an approved complete package.
6. Review the range as evidence accumulates
Set a review date and track the reasons qualified candidates proceed, decline, or withdraw. Separate compensation concerns from schedule, workload, location, and slow decision-making. A search can struggle even when pay is competitive, and increasing pay will not automatically fix an unclear role.
Update the brief when credible evidence changes the assumptions. Keep previous versions so the team can see what changed and why. The final deliverable should be a range with a rationale, a transparent package, and an approval process. That is more useful than calling a figure competitive without explaining the comparison behind it.
Sources and further reading
Sources checked September 30, 2026
- BLS — Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics OverviewExplains occupational wage estimates and their coverage; broad categories may not isolate a clinical specialty.
- BLS — Using OEWS Data During Salary NegotiationsShows how occupation, industry, and location inform wage research; estimates are not individualized salary guarantees.
- BLS — OEWS Data TablesOfficial wage tables for researching comparable occupations and geographic areas.